Prepare for UPSC with Confidence – Explore Free Quizzes, Study Material, and Expert Guidance!

19 December 2024 Daily Current Affairs

Context: Amid the heated debates surrounding Indian politics, one critical issue often goes unnoticed: the practice of One Candidate Contesting from Multiple Constituencies (OCMC) for the same office. This longstanding tradition raises significant questions about its implications for democracy, taxpayers, and political fairness.

Background:

The Indian Constitution entrusts Parliament with the responsibility of regulating elections. The Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951, governs electoral practices and has evolved over time:

  • Pre-1996: Candidates could contest from any number of constituencies.
  • Post-1996 Amendment: The law was revised to limit candidates to a maximum of two constituencies per election.

Despite these changes, OCMC remains prevalent, especially in State Legislative Assembly elections. For instance, November 2024 saw 44 by-elections due to legislators vacating seats after winning in multiple constituencies.

Arguments Against OCMC:

  1. Increased Burden on Taxpayers: The administrative cost of elections is significant, and by-elections triggered by seat vacancies add unnecessary expenses, ultimately borne by the taxpayers.
  2. Advantage for the Ruling Party:By-elections held within six months often favor the ruling party, which can leverage state machinery, resources, and patronage, creating an uneven playing field for the opposition.
  3. Financial Strain on Opponents: By-elections compel defeated candidates and their parties to spend additional resources on repeated contests, intensifying their financial strain.
  4. Erosion of Democratic Values: OCMC allows leaders to hedge their bets, prioritizing political gains over genuine public service, undermining the essence of democratic representation.
  5. Voter Discontent: Winning candidates vacating seats disrupt voter expectations of representation, causing dissatisfaction and eroding trust in the electoral process.
  6. Constitutional Concerns:  A petition in Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs Union of India (2023) argued that vacating a seat after winning violates voters’ trust and contradicts the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a).

Arguments in Favor of OCMC:

  1. Safety Net for Candidates: In closely contested elections, OCMC provides candidates with a backup option, reducing the risks associated with uncertain outcomes.
  2. International Precedents: Countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh permit candidates to contest multiple constituencies, albeit with the condition of relinquishing all but one seat after the election.

Proposed Reforms by the Election Commission of India (ECI):

  1. Ban OCMC:  Amend Section 33(7) of the RPA, 1951, to prohibit candidates from contesting multiple constituencies.
  • This recommendation aligns with the 255th Law Commission Report (2015).
  1. Recover By-Election Costs: Hold candidates who vacate seats responsible for the entire cost of conducting by-elections.

Conclusion:

The practice of OCMC imposes financial and administrative burdens that could be better utilized for developmental priorities. Adopting the principle of One Candidate, One Constituency (OCOC) aligns with the democratic ideals of “one person, one vote.” However, its successful implementation demands political consensus and active support from major political parties.

Addressing this issue is essential for strengthening democratic accountability and ensuring fairer electoral practices in India.

Context: The second India-Iran-Armenia Trilateral Consultations were successfully conducted in New Delhi, showcasing the growing partnership between the three nations.

Key Highlights of the Discussions:

  1. Boosting Connectivity:
  • The discussions emphasized the critical role of connectivity initiatives, particularly through the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC).
  • The importance of Chabahar Port in advancing regional connectivity and trade was underscored.
  1. Strengthening Multilateral Engagement:
  • The three nations deliberated on enhancing their collective influence in global multilateral platforms by fostering deeper collaboration.
  1. Addressing Regional Developments:
  • The consultations focused on promoting peace and stability across the region, emphasizing the significance of joint efforts in mitigating regional challenges.
  1. Expanding Trade, Tourism, and Cultural Exchange:
  • Strategies to strengthen trade, tourism, and cultural exchanges were explored, with an aim to foster people-to-people connections.
  1. Armenia’s Connectivity Vision:
  • Armenia presented its initiative, “The Crossroads of Peace,” aimed at enhancing transportation links to connect the Caspian Sea with the Mediterranean Sea and the Persian Gulf with the Black Sea, promoting efficient regional connectivity.

Did You Know?

  • The International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) is a 7,200-km-long multi-modal transportation network connecting India, Iran, Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Central Asia, and Europe for seamless freight movement.
  • The Chabahar Port, located in Iran’s Sistan-Balochistan province, is being jointly developed by India and Iran. It plays a pivotal role in enhancing regional trade, particularly facilitating India’s connectivity with Afghanistan.

Importance of the Trilateral Meeting:

The second India-Iran-Armenia consultations underline the growing commitment to fostering regional cooperation and development. By focusing on shared goals, these discussions pave the way for enhanced collaboration in various fields, contributing to regional stability and economic prosperity.

Looking Ahead

  • The three nations reaffirmed their dedication to continued cooperation under this trilateral framework.
  • It was agreed that the next round of consultations would be hosted by Iran at a mutually convenient date, further strengthening the alliance.

This meeting highlights the shared vision of India, Iran, and Armenia in driving growth, stability, and connectivity across the region, setting a strong foundation for future collaboration.

Context: Minority rights are vital for preserving cultural, linguistic, and religious diversity in any democracy. The Indian Constitution, along with global frameworks like the United Nations’ 1992 Declaration on Minority Rights, underscores the need to protect minority communities.Franklin Roosevelt once remarked, “No democracy can long survive which does not accept as fundamental to its very existence the recognition of the rights of minorities.”

Historical Context:

The idea of minority rights emerged from 19th-century European constitutional reforms:

  • Austria (1867): Recognized the rights of ethnic minorities to preserve their languages and identities.
  • Hungary (1868): Enacted similar protections.
  • Post-World War I Treaties: Nations like Poland and Czechoslovakia included minority protections in their agreements.

India’s Constitution drew inspiration from these principles, emphasizing inclusivity and diversity.

Constitutional Provisions for Minorities:

Article 29: Right to Cultural Preservation:

  • Empowers citizens to protect their culture, language, and script.
  • Ensures equality and dignity for all cultural identities.

Article 30: Right to Educational Institutions:

  • Allows religious and linguistic minorities to establish and manage their own institutions.
  • Judicial View: The Supreme Court sees this as crucial for equality and non-discrimination.
    • Recent Verdict: Aligarh Muslim University (2024) upheld the institution’s minority character.

Article 350 A: Ensures primary education in one’s mother tongue.

Article 350 B: Provides for a Special Officer to address linguistic minorities’ concerns.

The Constitution also accommodates personal laws, such as the customary laws of the Nagas, promoting legal diversity.

Understanding ‘Minority’

The term ‘minority’ isn’t explicitly defined in the Constitution. However:

  • Judicial Clarifications: The Supreme Court, in cases like TMA Pai Foundation (2002), defined minorities at the state level (e.g., Hindus are minorities in Punjab and northeastern states).
  • Criteria for Minority Institutions:
    • Founder’s Intent: The institution must primarily serve minority communities.
    • Operational Factors: Includes funding sources, administration, and objectives.

Judicial Safeguards for Minority Institutions:

Though autonomous, minority institutions are subject to:

  • Regulation: Governments can intervene to prevent maladministration and ensure quality.
  • Fair Aid: Article 30(2) prohibits discrimination in granting aid to minority institutions.

Why Are Minority Rights Essential?

Preservation of Diversity:

Minority rights ensure that cultural identities flourish within a supportive environment.

Balancing Individual and Group Rights

  • While individual equality (Articles 14-18, 19, 25) is critical, it must be complemented by group rights for minorities.
  • Judicial Insight: Courts emphasize that special protections are necessary for substantive equality.

Relevance in Contemporary India:

  • Legacy of Pluralism: Articles 25-30 highlight India’s commitment to its multicultural fabric.
  • Global Standards: Aligns with international benchmarks like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Conclusion:

India’s Constitution strikes a fine balance between individual equality and group recognition, making minority rights a cornerstone of its democratic ethos.

As socio-political landscapes evolve, it’s imperative to remain vigilant and adapt policies to protect the rights of minorities. In doing so, India reaffirms its vision of an inclusive and harmonious society.

4. Reforming National Entrance Exams: Towards Transparency and Efficiency

Context: A high-level committee, chaired by former ISRO chief K. Radhakrishnan, has proposed transformative reforms to enhance transparency and efficiency in national entrance examinations like NEET, CUET, and UGC-NET.

Drawing inspiration from the election framework, these reforms aim to fortify the integrity of the examination system and eliminate malpractices.

Overview: 

The NTA was established in 2017 as an autonomous and self-sustaining body under the Ministry of Education.

  • Registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.
  • Functions under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
  • Led by a Director General and a governing body appointed by the Union Government.

Background: 

  • In 2010, a committee comprising IIT directors recommended creating a transparent, autonomous agency modeled after the Educational Testing Service (ETS) of the USA.
  • Before the NTA’s inception, various entities like CBSE, UGC, and universities conducted their own entrance tests.

Objectives:

The NTA aims to:

  • Conduct transparent, efficient, and globally standardized tests for admissions and recruitment.
  • Undertake research on educational and testing systems to address knowledge gaps.
  • Identify experts and institutions for setting exam papers.
  • Disseminate research on education standards and professional development.

Key Exams Conducted by the NTA:

  • JEE (Main), NEET-UG, UGC-NET, CMAT, GPAT, etc.
  • The National Education Policy 2020 envisions a broader role for the NTA to conduct entrance tests for all universities across India.

Challenges Faced by the NTA:

1. Accountability Issues:

  • While computer-based tests ensure efficiency, outsourcing to third-party technical partners reduces government accountability.
  • This reliance on external agencies creates vulnerabilities in the system.

2. Manpower Shortages: The NTA operates with only 25 permanent staff, relying heavily on outsourced functions.

3. Weak Security Mechanisms:

  • Large-scale pen-and-paper exams require robust measures to secure:
    • Question paper preparation and encryption.
    • Printing, transportation, and storage processes.
    • Exam center operations and answer sheet collection.

4. Incidents of Irregularities:

  • NEET-UG: Alleged question paper leaks compromised the exam’s credibility.
  • UGC-NET: Reports of integrity breaches led to exam cancellations.

Recommendations by the High-Level Committee:

  1. Election-Style Framework:
  • State Collaboration: States to assist in administering exams, akin to the general election model.
  • Presiding Officers: Each exam center to have an NTA-appointed officer overseeing operations.
  1. Sealing and Securing Centers: Exam centers to be sealed before the tests and unsealed in the presence of district administration and NTA officials.
  2. State and District Committees:
  • State-Level Committees: Led by a nodal officer appointed by the Chief Secretary, with representatives from state police, NTA, IB, and NIC.
  • District-Level Committees: Headed by district magistrates to identify secure exam centers and manage question paper transportation.
  1. Background Checks for Centers: Vet exam centers based on ownership, past records, and intelligence inputs to mitigate security risks.
  2. Reduced Dependency on Private Agencies: Gradually replace private test delivery agencies with Kendriya Vidyalayas and Navodaya Vidyalayas, which will develop digital infrastructure.
  3. Technology Integration: 
  • Digi-Exam System: Inspired by DigiYatra, this system will use biometric data for candidate verification.
  • CCTV Monitoring: Continuous surveillance of candidates during exams with district-level monitoring centers.
  1. Role Redefinition for NTA:  Focus solely on entrance exams for higher education, leaving recruitment exams to other entities.
  2. Flexibility in Exam Modes: The decision on whether NEET will be computer-based or pen-and-paper rests with the Health Ministry, while the NTA serves as the service provider.

Conclusion:

The proposed reforms signify a paradigm shift in managing national entrance exams, emphasizing fairness, efficiency, and security.

By adopting an election-style approach and leveraging advanced technology, these measures aim to rebuild trust in the system, ensuring that examinations are conducted with integrity and transparency.

Context: Moldova has recently signed the International Solar Alliance (ISA) Framework Agreement, marking a significant step in its journey toward embracing renewable energy solutions and combating climate change.

About the International Solar Alliance (ISA):

Background:

  • The ISA Framework Agreement came into force in 2017, opening membership to all United Nations member states following its amendment in 2020.
  • Headquartered in Gurugram, India, the ISA was launched during COP21 in Paris, 2015, as a joint initiative by India and France.
  • The ISA’s mission centers on uniting global efforts to address climate change by advancing solar energy solutions.

Mission and Goals:

The ISA’s strategy, known as ‘Towards 1000,’ focuses on three ambitious goals:

  1. Mobilizing USD 1,000 billion in investments for solar energy by 2030.
  2. Ensuring energy access for 1,000 million people worldwide.
  3. Facilitating the installation of 1,000 GW of solar energy capacity globally.

Governance:

  • The ISA Assembly serves as the apex decision-making body, shaping policies and overseeing the implementation of the Framework Agreement.
  • As of now, the ISA has a membership base of 104 countries with 16 signatory nations.

Key Initiatives of the International Solar Alliance (ISA):

1. Scaling Solar Applications for Agricultural Use (SSAAU):

  • This initiative focuses on meeting the rising demand for solar-powered water pumps to enhance agricultural productivity and sustainability.

2. ISA CARES:

  • Aims to provide innovative solar energy solutions for healthcare systems in low- and middle-income nations, strengthening medical infrastructure.

3. Solarizing Heating and Cooling Systems:

  • Addresses the growing need for sustainable heating and cooling solutions across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors by promoting solar technologies.

4. Global Solar Facility:

  • Launched during COP27, this initiative is dedicated to boosting solar investments in underserved regions, particularly in Africa and other vulnerable geographies.

Significance of Moldova’s Membership:

Moldova’s decision to join the ISA highlights its dedication to expanding renewable energy adoption, reducing dependence on fossil fuels, and contributing to global efforts against climate change.

By signing the ISA Framework Agreement, Moldova stands to benefit from:

  • Access to advanced solar technologies.
  • Opportunities for collaborative projects with member nations.
  • Support in achieving its sustainability goals and fostering energy security.

Conclusion:

Moldova’s alignment with the International Solar Alliance not only reinforces its commitment to a greener future but also strengthens global cooperation in harnessing solar energy for sustainable development.

The ISA continues to lead the charge in transforming the world’s energy landscape, paving the way for a renewable energy revolution.

Context: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has demanded the return of a valuable collection of letters written by Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister. These letters, which hold immense historical significance, were reportedly relocated to the residence of former Congress president Sonia Gandhi in 2008. Originally part of the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML), now renamed the Prime Ministers’ Museum and Library (PMML), these documents are deemed an integral part of India’s national heritage.

Background:

  • Significance of the Letters: These documents, penned by Jawaharlal Nehru, were addressed to prominent personalities like Lady Edwina Mountbatten, Babu Jagjivan Ram, and Jayaprakash Narayan, offering insights into the socio-political landscape of his time.
  • Historical Context:
    • The letters were donated to the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library in 1971.
    • In 2008, 51 cartons of these letters were reportedly moved to Sonia Gandhi’s residence with the approval of the then NMML director.
  • Communication of the Era: These letters reflect the traditional correspondence practices that were vital in shaping India’s post-independence era.

BJP’s Allegations:

  • Ownership and Access: The BJP argues that these letters are not personal property but part of India’s national historical record, emphasizing the need for public access.
  • Suppression Concerns: A planned digitization project in 2010 was halted due to the relocation of the documents, raising fears of potential attempts to conceal their content.

Prime Ministers’ Museum and Library (PMML):

  • History: Formerly known as the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, the institution was established in 1966 to honor Jawaharlal Nehru. It is located at the historic Teen Murti House, Nehru’s official residence.
  • Renaming: In 2023, the institution was renamed to reflect a broader focus, honoring all of India’s Prime Ministers.
  • Key Components:
    • Memorial Museum: Showcases Nehru’s life and contributions.
    • Modern India Library: Houses an extensive collection of historical resources.
    • Centre for Contemporary Studies: Facilitates research on current issues.
    • Nehru Planetarium: Promotes scientific knowledge and curiosity.
  • Digitization Initiatives: Efforts to make archival content accessible globally for researchers and historians.

Jawaharlal Nehru: A Visionary Leader:

  • Early Life: Born on November 14, 1889, in Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, he was the son of Motilal Nehru, a prominent Congress leader, and Swaroop Rani.
  • Education: Studied at Harrow School, Trinity College, Cambridge, and the Inner Temple, London.
  • Role in Freedom Movement: Inspired by Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru joined the struggle for India’s independence, participating in movements like the Non-Cooperation Movement and the Quit India Movement.
  • Prime Minister: Served as India’s first Prime Minister from 1947 to 1964, steering the nation through its formative years.
    • Economic Policies: Advocated a mixed economy and initiated the Five-Year Plans, focusing on agriculture and industry.
    • Foreign Relations:
      • Co-founded the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) with leaders from Egypt and Yugoslavia.
      • Promoted Panchsheel, the five principles of peaceful coexistence, with China.
    • Education and Science: Established institutions like IITs, AIIMS, and ISRO, cementing India’s focus on education and research.

Significance of Nehru’s Letters:

These letters are not just personal correspondences but a window into India’s history, providing valuable insights into its political, social, and cultural evolution. Their preservation as public heritage is essential for understanding the legacy of one of India’s most influential leaders.

Conclusion:

The BJP’s demand for the return of Jawaharlal Nehru’s letters underscores the broader need to preserve and make accessible India’s historical artifacts. Safeguarding such documents ensures that future generations can learn from the legacy of the nation’s founding leaders, fostering a deeper connection to India’s rich history.

Share:

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

1. India: Leading the World in Remittances in 2024 Context: India has retained its position as the largest recipient of...
1. India’s Treatment of Rohingya Detainees: A Human Rights Concern Context: A recent report has highlighted serious violations of constitutional...
1. Public Distribution System (PDS) in India: Enhancing Food Security for the Vulnerable Context: The Comptroller and Auditor General of...